People v. Lavan CA2/7

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent Lavan on appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues. On April 27, 2015, we advised Lavan he had 30 days within which to submit any contentions or issues he wanted us to consider. We have received no response. We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that Lavan’s attorney on appeal has fully complied with the responsibilities of counsel and no arguable issue exists. (See Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284 [120 S.Ct. 746, 145 L.Ed.2d 756]; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 112-113; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

DISPOSITION

The order is affirmed.

SEGAL, J.

We concur:

PERLUSS, P. J.

ZELON, J.

3