Vasquez

Vasquez v. Salem CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 7, 2015G052057California741 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/6/15 Vasquez v. Salem CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

BERNARD VASQUEZ,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G052057

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2012-00588366)

YASSER SALEM, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, William D. Claster, Judge. Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Bernard Vasquez, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Carroll, Kelly, Trotter, Franzen, McKenna & Peabody, John C. Kelly, David P. Pruett and Sandra J. Carlson for Defendant and Appellant. * * *

THE COURT:*

We dismiss plaintiff’s appeal because there is no appealable judgment or order.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.