Holland

Holland v. Cal. State Personnel Bd. CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 7, 2015A138206California5,818 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/7/15 Holland v. Cal. State Personnel Bd. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

CHERI HOLLAND,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A138206

v. CALIFORNIA STATE PERSONNEL (Alameda County BOARD, Super. Ct. No. HG12622519) Defendant;

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

EDUCATION,

Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Appellant California Department of Education dismissed respondent Cheri Holland, a business manager employed at the California School for the Blind, after an audit disclosed that Holland’s then husband used a Costco cash card procured by Holland with school funds to purchase items for his personal use. After Holland appealed to the State Personnel Board, an administrative law judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.