Womack

Womack v. Lovell CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2015G050522California611 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/12/15 Womack v. Lovell CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ART WOMACK,

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and G050522 Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2011-00438896) v.

OPINION

DAVID ANGUS LOVELL et al.,

Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants;

MARK CABALLERO,

Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Derek W. Hunt, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions. Law Offices of Lenore Albert and Lenore L. Albert for Defendants, Cross- complainants and Appellants. Law Office of Mitchell B. Hannah, Mitchell B. Hannah and Hallie D. Hannah for Plaintiff, Cross-defendants and Respondents. * * * This is the attorney fee sequel to Womack v. Lovell…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.