Pulido

Pulido v. Cemak Trucking CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2015D065789California6,149 words

Opinion

Opinion

Irion, J.

Filed 8/12/15 Pulido v. Cemak Trucking CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BRIDGET PULIDO, D065789

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVVS-1203259)

CEMAK TRUCKING, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County,

Pamela Preston King, Judge. Affirmed.

Cholakian & Associates, Kevin K. Cholakian and David L. Barch for Defendant

and Appellant.

Perona, Langer, Beck, Serbin, Mendoza & Harrison, Ellen R. Serbin; Law Office

of Scott E. Spell, Scott E. Spell; Sekin, Begakis & Bish and Mindy S. Bish for Plaintiff

and Respondent. Cemak Trucking, Inc. (Cemak) appeals from a judgment of $1,978,794.69 against

it following a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.