Tiara de La Pacifica Homeowners Assn. v. Heilan CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2015G050413California2,642 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ikola, J.

FACTS

We begin our factual recitation by stating two rules which every appellant must follow. First, an appellant must include all “significant facts” in his or her brief. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(2)(C).) Failure to state all of the evidence fairly in the brief waives the alleged error. (Foreman & Clark Corp. v. Fallon (1971) 3 Cal.3d 875, 881.) Second, an appellant’s contentions must be supported by reasoned argument. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(1)(B).) An unsupported contention is deemed abandoned. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 845.) Defendant’s appellate brief omits critical facts and, although she recounts much legal authority, she does so without analyzing how her authority relates to the

All statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise stated.

2 significant facts in this case. We could simply affirm the judgment on the ground that defendant’s claims of error have been waived or abandoned on appeal. But even the most cursory review of the evidence submitted to the trial court in support of plaintiff’s application for a default judgment establishes that the judgment far exceeds any amount demanded in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.