Marriage of Brandes CA4/1

Caution
239 Cal. App. 4th 1461·2015 WL 5097698
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 14, 2015D062729California10,714 words

Opinion

Opinion

McCONNELL, J.

In this dissolution action, Linda F. Brandes (Linda) appeals a judgment awarding Charles H. Brandes (Charles) a business he founded before the marriage, Brandes Investment Partners (BIP), as his separate property, and awarding the community an equitable allocation— under the Pereira v. Pereira (1909) 156 Cal. 1 [ 103 P. 488 ] (Pereira) approach for the early period during which the growth was primarily attributable to his personal efforts, and under the Van Camp v. Van Camp (1921) 53 Cal.App. 17 [ 199 P. 885 ] (Van Camp) approach for the later period during which the growth was primarily attributable to other factors. The Pereira approach allocates a fair return to the separate property investment and the balance of growth to the community, and the Van Camp approach allocates the reasonable value of the owner spouse’s services to the community and the balance of growth to separate property. (In re Marriage of Dekker (1993) 17 Cal.App.4th 842, 853-854 [ 21 Cal.Rptr.2d 642 ] (Dekker).)

Under a variety of theories, Linda contends the court erred by not determining the community owns all or most of BIP. For instance, she asserts BIP became a completely new business during…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.