Fidelity National Financial v. Colin Friedman

Bad Law
803 F.3d 999·2015 WL 5827575
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 201513-15954California1,683 words

Opinion

Opinion

Friedman, J.

ORDER

Defendants-Appellees’ Motion for Amendment of Opinion is GRANTED. The opinion filed August 17, 2015, and published at 2015 WL 4879963 , is amended by the opinion filed concurrently with this order, as follows:

At opinion page 1001, 2015 WL 4879963 , at *1, after “We therefore reverse the judgment of the district court” add “and remand the case.”

At opinion page 1003, 2015 WL 4879963 , at *3, add the following footnote at the end of the conclusion paragraph:

At opinion page 1003, 2015 WL 4879963 , at *4, change “REVERSED” to “REVERSED and REMANDED.”

The panel has voted to deny Defendants-Appellees’ petition for panel rehearing. Judges Graber and Watford have voted to deny Defendants-Appellees’ peti tion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Friedman has so recommended.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.

Defendants-Appellees’ petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or for rehearing en banc will be entertained.

OPINION

The federal registration statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1963 , permits plaintiffs to take a judgment entered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.