In re N.H. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In October 2013, mother’s children (I.L., age 15; J.L., age 12; E.L., age 9; R.F.,
age 6 (sometimes collectively referred to as “half siblings”); W.H., age 2 (born August
2011); and N.H., age 1 (born September 2012)2) came to the attention of San Bernardino
Children and Family Services (CFS), after CFS received referrals indicating the children
were left unsupervised without food, mother was abusing drugs and alcohol, and her
boyfriend may have been selling drugs out of the home. On December 5, 2013, CFS
filed petitions on behalf of all of the children pursuant to section 300, subdivisions (b)
(failure to protect) and (g) (failure to provide for children), alleging that mother had a
substance abuse problem and a history of domestic violence.3 On December 6, 2013, the
trial court found a prima facie case under section 300 and detained the children with
mother.
All further undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.
W.H. and N.H. share the same “alleged” father, who was not involved in the 2 proceedings and is not a party to this appeal.
3 Where sibling documents are redundant, this opinion will…