Enciso

Enciso v. Aardema CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 17, 2015D065872California9,149 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

Filed 8/17/15 Enciso v. Aardema CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

GILBERT L. ENCISO, D065872

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2013-00044341-

CU-BC-CTL)

PETER AARDEMA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joel M.

Pressman, Judge. Reversed.

David A. Kay for Defendant and Appellant.

Law Office of Martin N. Buchanan, Martin N. Buchanan; The O'Brien Law Firm

and John J. O'Brien for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Plaintiff and respondent Gilbert L. Enciso is a licensed real estate broker who had

a business relationship with defendant and appellant Peter Aardema, who managed his

family trust's real estate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.