Letizia

Letizia v. Wentworth, Paoli & Purdy CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 17, 2015G050132California1,309 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ikola, J.

Filed 8/17/15 Letizia v. Wentworth, Paoli & Purdy CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

CLARICE J. LETIZIA,

Cross-Complainant and G050132 Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2012-00584165) v.

OPINION

WENTWORTH, PAOLI, & PURDY, LLP,

Cross-Defendant, and Respondent. .

Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Orange County, John C. Gastelum, Judge. Affirmed. Miller Johnson Law, Jon B. Miller, and Scott A. Johnson for Cross- complainant and Appellant. Paoli & Purdy and William M. Delli Paoli for Cross-defendant and Respondent. * * * Clarice J. Letizia appeals from the court’s postjudgment order denying her motion to be reimbursed by Wentworth, Paoli, & Purdy, LLP (WPP) for attorney fees 1 under Labor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.