Walter Emmett Maxted v. United States

Good Law
405 F.2d 173·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9442
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 7, 196922773California597 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duniway, J.

Maxted appeals from a judgment convicting him under four counts of an indictment charging him with violations of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, sale of marijuana and concealing and facilitating the transportation and concealment of marijuana, knowing that it had been unlawfully-brought into the United States. The sole claim of error is that certain testimony regarding other wrongful acts of Maxted was erroneously admitted.

Two transactions were involved, one on June 17, 1966, and one on July 11, 1966. Each involved a purchase of marijuana by an undercover agent, Katz, through one Wilson. Maxted delivered the marijuana. After the government rested, Maxted opened his case by calling another government agent, Saiz. On direct, Saiz testified that he had known Maxted for two and a half years, that Maxted had worked with him as an informant, helping to determine who were traffickers in narcotics, that Maxted did this a number of times, that he introduced Saiz to a trafficker from whom Saiz made a buy, that Maxted cooperated and did as he was instructed. On cross-examination, Saiz was asked if he knew why Maxted was working for the Bureau of Narcotics. To this an objection, on grounds of hearsay,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.