Benjamin Ortega v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
613 F. App'x 649
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 201512-72633California607 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Benjamin Ortega (“Ortega”), a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a), and we deny the petition for review.

Ortega contends that he suffered past persecution in the form of physical abuse by his father when he was a child and has a well-founded fear of future persecution on this basis were he to be removed to El Salvador. “To establish eligibility for asylum, an applicant must demonstrate his or her status as a refugee.” Melkonian v. Ashcroft, 320 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir.2003) (citing Sangha v. INS, 103 F.3d 1482, 1487 (9th Cir.1997)). On a claim of past persecution committed by a private individual, the applicant bears the burden of showing that the government is unable or unwilling to control the persecutor. See Afriyie v. Holder, 613 F.3d 924, 931 (9th Cir.2010).

Reviewing the Board’s conclusion that Ortega failed to establish past persecution for substantial evidence, Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1060 (9th Cir.2009), we determine that the Board was not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.