People v. Nonnette CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 20, 2015E062218California550 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Defendant was required to register as a sex offender after a 1987 conviction. The

San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department crime report succinctly describes the

circumstances of the current crime: “Nonnette has been registering as a transient sex

offender. He was not found at any of the places he listed as frequenting during

compliance checks. On 07/31/2013, Nonnette came to the Victorville City Sheriff’s

Station to complete a 30-day transient registration. During an interview with Nonnette,

he said he was living at a house on Pluto near Bear Valley and would not provide the

address, and has been staying at his mother’s residence in Temecula and would not

provide her address. Nonnette registered as moving to Montclair, but has not registered

with the Montclair Police Department or any other law enforcement agency.”

On August 4, 2014, the People filed a first amended felony complaint charging

defendant in count one with failing to register (Pen. Code, § 290.010)1 and in count two

with failing to advise the prior agency of a move (§ 290.013). The People alleged that

defendant had a prior strike conviction (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i) & 1170.12, subds.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.