Rutledge

Rutledge v. Hewlett-Packard

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 21, 2015H036790MCalifornia11,836 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/21/15 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

ED RUTLEDGE et al., H036790 (Santa Clara County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. CV817837

v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,

NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

Defendant and Respondent;

BIZCOM ELECTRONICS, INC.,

Objector and Respondent.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 22, 2015, be modified as follows: 1. On the signature line 2, the name “PREMO, J.” is replaced with “ELIA, J.” and on the signature line 3, the name “ELIA, J.” is replaced with “WALSH, J.*” so the signature page reflects the correct panel as follows: ______________________________________

RUSHING, P.J.

WE CONCUR:

____________________________________

ELIA, J.

___________________________________

WALSH, J.*

* Judge of the Santa Clara County Superior Court assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

There is no change in judgment.

Respondent’s petition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.