Baharestani

Baharestani v. ZOLL Circulation CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 21, 2015H039028California8,607 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

Filed 8/21/15 Baharestani v. ZOLL Circulation CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

HOSSEIN BAHARESTANI, H039028

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 110CV177164)

v.

ZOLL CIRCULATION, INC.

Defendant and Appellant.

Plaintiff Hossein Baharestani, an electrical engineer, was terminated in July 2008 by his employer, defendant ZOLL Circulation, Inc. (ZOLL), a medical device manufacturer. Baharestani had worked as an at-will employee for ZOLL for approximately 21 months. He sued ZOLL for wrongful termination in violation of public policy, pursuant to Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (1980) 27 Cal.3d 167 (Tameny). (Hereafter, this claim is sometimes referred to as a Tameny claim.) He claimed he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.