Pinon

People v. Pinon

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 24, 2015G051212MCalifornia3,445 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ikola, J.

Filed 8/21/15 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G051212

v. (Super. Ct. No. 11WF1938)

JAIME MANUEL PINON, ORDER MODIYING OPINION

AND DENYING PETITION FOR

Defendant and Appellant. REHEARING; CHANGE IN

JUDGMENT

It is hereby ordered that the opinion filed on July 23, 2015, be modified as follows: The last sentence at the bottom of page 6, beginning with “We will remand, therefore,” and ending at the top of page 7 with “of defendant’s PRCS” is deleted and the following paragraphs are inserted in its place, with footnote 2 remaining at the end of the last added paragraph: “Next we must address how to calculate the parole period in light of defendant’s excess custody credits. On a petition for rehearing, the People contend the credits should first be applied to the one-year parole period, and then, if the parole period is still longer than the remaining PRCS period, reduce the parole period to coincide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.