In re Jason H. CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 24, 2015B255838California4,353 words

Opinion

Opinion

Segal, J.

INTRODUCTION

Jason H., Sr., (Jason H.) appeals from the juvenile court’s orders at the six-month

and 12-month review hearings (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subds. (e), (f))1 finding that the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services provided him reasonable reunification services as to his son, Jason H., Jr. (Jason). In the first appeal (case No. B255838), which is from an order at the six-month review hearing, Jason H. argues that, between the disposition hearing and six-month review hearing, the Department did not assist him in complying with his court-ordered case plan and did not offer him reasonable reunification services. In the second appeal (case No. B259123), which is from an order at the 12-month review hearing, Jason H. argues that, between the six-month review hearing and the 12-month review hearing, the Department did not provide him reasonable reunification services, and that the juvenile court violated his due process rights by denying his request for a contested hearing on whether the Department provided him reasonable services. We reverse the juvenile court’s orders finding that the Department provided Jason H. with reasonable services…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.