Fluor Corporation v. United States

Good Law
405 F.2d 823
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 11, 196921307California4,198 words

Opinion

Opinion

405 F.2d 823 FLUOR CORPORATION, Ltd., et al., Union Tank Car Company, Ward Industries Corporation, Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America ex rel. MOSHER STEEL COMPANY, Appellees and Cross-Appellants. Nos. 21307, 21307A, 21307B and 21307C. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Jan. 6, 1969, Rehearing Denied Feb. 11, 1969. Evans, Kitchel & Jenckes, Phoenix, Ariz., Hull, Terry & Bret Harte, Boyle, Bilby, Thompson & Shoenhair, Tucson, Ariz., Thomas C. McConnell, Chicago, Ill. (argued), Lotterman & Weiser, New York City, for appellants & cross-appellees. Locke, Purnell, Boren, Laney & Neely, Dallas, Tex., Cusick, Watkins & Frey, Tucson, Ariz., for appellees. Before HAMLIN, BROWNING and ELY, Circuit Judges. BROWNING, Cirucit Judge: 1 The district court rendered judgment in favor of Mosher Steel Company and against the various appellants for prices agreed to be paid for materials furnised and services rendered by Mosher in the fabrication of steel used in the construction of missile launch facilities in Arizona and california. 1 We affirm the trial court's judgment except as it denied prejudgment interest. As to this, we reverse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.