Stapke & Harris v. Raskov CA2/7
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 8/25/15 Stapke & Harris v. Raskov CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
STAPKE & HARRIS, LLP, B256473
Cross-complainant and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC433843) v.
DANIEL RASKOV,
Cross-defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Steven J. Kleifield, Judge. Affirmed. Daniel Raskov, in pro. per., for Cross-defendant and Appellant. Sandra J. Gamboa, for Cross-complainant and Respondent. ______________ Daniel Raskov appeals from a postjudgment order awarding $137,025 in attorney fees to the law firm of Stapke & Harris after the firm prevailed on its cross-complaint against Raskov for breach of contract. Without challenging the amount of…