People v. Manning CA4/1

FACTS

Manning unlawfully and repeatedly followed another person and made a malicious

and credible threat intending to place that person in fear for his safety and, in doing so,

violated a valid restraining order prohibiting that behavior.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the proceedings below.

Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for

2 error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California

(1967) 386 U.S. 738. Counsel has identified as possible, but not arguable, issues to be

whether the trial court erred in ordering the restitution fine under section 1202.4,

subdivision (b), in the amount of $1440, and whether the trial court erred in the protective

order it imposed. We granted Manning permission to file a supplemental brief on his

own behalf and he has responded, but his response identified no issue that is cognizable

on appeal from a guilty plea. (See, e.g., People v. Hunter (2002) 100 Cal.App.4th 37, 41-

42.)

A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and

Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738 has disclosed no…