Sternberg

Sternberg v. California State Board of Pharmacy

Good Law
239 Cal. App. 4th 1159
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2015B255862California4,946 words

Opinion

Opinion

Flier, J.

Representing himself, Andrew M. Sternberg appeals the trial court’s denial of a petition for a writ of administrative mandate. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.) He seeks to reverse a decision by the California State Board of Pharmacy (Board) subjecting his pharmacist’s license to discipline following the discovery of an employee’s widespread theft of a dangerous drug from the pharmacy Sternberg supervised as the pharmacist-in-charge. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Sternberg obtained his pharmacy license in 1978. Between 2001 and 2012, he worked as the pharmacist-in-charge at a Target store in West Hills, California. During a two-year period while he supervised the Target pharmacy — September 1, 2006, to August 31, 2008 — Imelda Hurtado, a pharmacy technician, stole at least 216,630 tablets of Norco from the pharmacy, with an estimated retail value of up to $1.50 per tablet, or $324,945, and street value of up to $5 per tablet, or $1,083,150. Sternberg was subject to licensing discipline for the theft. Prior to this incident, Sternberg had no history of discipline.

Hurtado accomplished this theft as follows; She would place orders for up to 3,000 tablets (six bottles with 500 tablets…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.