People v. King CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 26, 2015C077551California309 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/26/15 P. v. King CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C077551

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 99F07845)

v.

DAVID KING,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant David King appeals from a post-judgment order dismissing, for lack of jurisdiction, his motion to strike his remaining restitution fine imposed pursuant to Penal Code section 1202.4, subdivision (b). His appointed counsel asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We conclude the order dismissing defendant’s motion to strike is not appealable; therefore, we shall dismiss the instant appeal. We provide the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.