People v. Conley CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 2015E062559California131 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but he

has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we

have independently reviewed the record for potential error and find no arguable issues.

(See People v. Jones (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1312, 1316 [An on-the-record oral admission

of the prior conviction allegation constitutes sufficient evidence to support the prior

conviction allegation.]; See also People v. McGuire (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 687, 697,

fn. 12 [guilty plea concedes all elements of offense, establishing sufficiency of the

evidence of guilt]; People v. Maultsby (2012) 53 Cal.4th 296, 304, fn. 6.)

3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

McKINSTER Acting P. J.

We concur:

KING

J.

MILLER

J.

4