Palmer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 8/27/15 Palmer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DIANE C. PALMER, DO67434
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CIVRS1106927) v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino, Barry L. Plotkin,
Judge. Affirmed.
Diane C. Palmer, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Bryan Cave and Julie W. O'Dell, David J. Joerger, Sean D. Muntz, and Richard P.
Steelman, Jr., for Defendant and Respondent.
Diane C. Palmer challenges the trial court's order setting aside the default judgment
against JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Chase) and the trial court's entry of judgment of dismissal
with prejudice of her first amended complaint.…