Reed

Reed v. Ryan CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 2015B253342California2,795 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/27/15 Reed v. Ryan CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

ALEXANDRA REED, B253342

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC093212) v.

SAMANTHA RYAN,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Amy D. Hogue, Judge. Affirmed.

Ross S. Heckmann for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez, Trestoer, Eugene J. Egan, Steven J. Renick and Marilyn R. Victor; Tseng & Associates and Jennifer Tina Tseng for Defendant and Respondent.

__________________________ Plaintiff Alexandra Reed appeals from the trial court’s order vacating a default judgment in her favor and allowing defendant Samantha Ryan to file an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.