Marks

Marks v. Lasalle CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 2015G050004California4,623 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/27/15 Marks v. Lasalle CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

LEE MARKS,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G050004

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2011-00459265)

ANGELE LASALLE et al., OPINION

Defendants and Appellants.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Robert J. Moss, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed with directions in part. Law Office of Frank W. Battaile and Frank W. Battaile for Defendants and Appellants Angele Lasalle and Angeline Dao. Arent Fox, Victor P. Danhi, Steven A. Haskins and George N. Koumbis for Defendants and Appellants First Recovery Repossession Services, Inc. and Barry Shapiro. Law Offices of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.