People v. Wright CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2015C076482California3,321 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/31/15 P. v. Wright CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo)

THE PEOPLE, C076482

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF133618)

v.

DANIEL SIDNEY WRIGHT,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Daniel Sidney Wright was convicted by a jury of kidnapping, inflicting corporal injury on a cohabitant, issuing criminal threats, false imprisonment by force or violence, dissuasion of a witness by threat of force, stalking, burglary, and child endangerment, all arising from the end of his relationship with his girlfriend, the victim. On appeal he contends (1) his conviction for false imprisonment must be reversed because it is a lesser included offense of kidnapping; (2) his punishment for dissuasion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.