Koka

Koka v. Shastri CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2015B253523California4,315 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grimes, J.

Filed 8/31/15 Koka v. Shastri CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

RUKMANI KOKA, B253523

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VC037226) v.

SUNIL SHASTRI,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Robert J. Higa, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of John R. Walton, John R. Walton, and Walter W. Moore for Defendant and Appellant.

Curd, Galindo & Smith and Joseph D. Curd for Plaintiff and Respondent. _____________ Plaintiffs Rukmani Koka, Lakshmana Koka, and Ramachandra Pulumati and defendant Sunil Shastri were partners in a real estate investment, each owning a 25 percent stake in the partnership’s only asset, real…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.