Hampton
Hampton v. Superior Court CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
DISCUSSION
Petitioner is currently incarcerated and contends he did not receive adequate credit
toward his sentence. He requested transcripts from his sentencing hearing to prove this
fact. The trial court initially granted the request but issued a subsequent minute order
indicating the transcripts, which were 17 years old, had been destroyed. Petitioner asks
us to order the release of his transcripts, for which he says he already paid, and for the
disclosure of the name of the court reporter who transcribed his sentencing hearing.
Because it appears the transcripts no longer exist, we cannot order them produced.
However, respondent has not indicated why it cannot provide the name of the court
reporter who transcribed the sentencing hearing. It also failed to answer petitioner’s
allegation that he paid for transcripts but has not been reimbursed.
Accordingly, we have determined that the petition should be granted in limited
part.
DISPOSITION
Let a peremptory writ of mandate issue, directing the Superior Court of San
Bernardino County to ascertain whether it can determine the name of the court reporter
who transcribed petitioner’s sentencing hearing. If it can,…