Vescomb

Vescomb v. Newcomb CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2015B252548California986 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/31/15 Vescomb v. Newcomb CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

DAVID M. VESCO, 2d Civil No. B252548 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2010-00384846- Plaintiff and Respondent, CU-OR-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

TAWNE MICHELE NEWCOMB,

Defendant and Appellant.

TAWNE MICHELE NEWCOMB, 2d Civil No. B255816 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2012-00415972- Plaintiff and Appellant, CU-OR-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

DAVID M. VESCO,

Defendant and Respondent.

Tawne Michele Newcomb appeals a judgment entered in favor of David M. Vesco following a court trial. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1987,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.