Newcomb

Filed 8/31/15 Newcomb v. Vesco CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

TAWNE MICHELE NEWCOMB, 2d Civil No. B254009 (Super. Ct. No. D342814) Plaintiff and Appellant, (Ventura County)

v.

DAVID M. VESCO,

Defendant and Respondent.

Tawne Michele Newcomb appeals an order of the family law court imposing $20,000 sanctions pursuant to Family Code section 271, and $69,364.91 reimbursement expenses in favor of David M. Vesco. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY1

In 1987, Vesco, a medical doctor, met Newcomb, a pharmaceutical representative, at a Michigan hospital where they were employed. Vesco was then married but separated from his wife. Vesco and Newcomb began dating and…