United States v. Cyrus Braswell

Good Law
615 F. App'x 444
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 201514-30014California134 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Cyrus D.A. Braswell appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Braswell’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Braswell has filed pro se supplemental briefs. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on appeal. Counsel’s motion-to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.