Rice

Rice v. Rancho Palma Grande HOA CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 1, 2015H038763California5,622 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

Filed 9/1/15 Rice v. Rancho Palma Grande HOA CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

ROBERT S. RICE, H038763

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 1-11-CV203558)

v.

RANCHO PALMA GRANDE

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Defendant and Appellant.

Plaintiff and appellant Robert S. Rice sued defendant Rancho Palma Grande Homeowners Association (the Association), claiming the Association’s practice of charging plaintiff two assessments each month for his single condominium within the Association’s development violated the Association’s covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&R’s) as well as the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Davis-Stirling Act). (Civ. Code, § 4000 et seq.)1 After a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.