Miah

Miah v. Obukhoff CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 2015B259501California3,566 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/2/15 Miah v. Obukhoff CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MOZOMIL MIAH, B259501

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC500602) v.

SERGE OBUKHOFF,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Ernest Hiroshige. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Amy Ghosh and Amy Ghosh for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Schmid & Voiles, Denise H. Greer and Michael V. Lamb for Defendant and Respondent. Mozomil Miah (appellant) appeals from a judgment in favor of Serge Obukhoff, M.D. (respondent) entered after respondent successfully moved for summary judgment on appellant’s claims of general negligence and professional negligence. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.