Shuiyue Jin v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
615 F. App'x 881
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 201513-72736California188 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Shuiyue Jin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 888, 890 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Jin’s motion to reopen, where the evidence does not compel the finding that she established exceptional circumstances for her failure to appear. See 8 U.S.C. 1229a(b)(5)(C)(i); Celis-Castellano, 298 F.3d at 892 (applying a totality of the circumstances test to determine whethdr exceptional circumstances were present); Limsico v. INS, 951 F.2d 210, 214 (9th Cir.1991) (agency has authority to evaluate contrary evidence).

Because this determination is disposi-tive, we need not reach Jin’s contentions regarding whether her illness was sufficiently serious to constitute exceptional circumstances.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.