James Cumbo v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison

Good Law
409 F.2d 400·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12954
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 196923097California275 words

Opinion

Opinion

In this habeas corpus proceeding brought in the district court by James Cumbo, an inmate of Arizona State Prison, the district court declared void, and vacated, the sentence imposed by the state trial court. The district court ordered Cumbo remanded to the custody of the Attorney General of the State of Arizona so that Cumbo could be re-sentenced. The warden appeals.

Apparently the district court was not made aware of the fact that Cumbo had not exhausted his state remedies. Cumbo’s appeal from his state conviction was then pending in the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One. State v. Cumbo, 451 P.2d 333 . On March 4, 1969, while this appeal was pending, that court reversed Cumbo’s conviction. It is not now known whether Cumbo will be retried by the State of Arizona or, if retried, whether he will again be convicted or, if again convicted, whether the sentence imposed will be subject to the same challenge which led the district court to grant relief in this habeas proceeding.

Under these circumstances this habeas proceeding has been rendered moot. Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234 , 88 S.Ct. 1556 , 20 L.Ed.2d 554 , relied upon by Cumbo, does not call for a different result. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.