Clark Elmore v. Stephen Sinclair
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 201512-99003California8,969 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CLARK ELMORE, No. 12-99003 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:08-cv-0053-RBL
STEPHEN SINCLAIR,
Respondent-Appellee. ORDER AND
AMENDED
OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 20, 2014—Portland, Oregon
Filed April 1, 2015 Amended September 3, 2015
Before: Richard R. Clifton, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.
Order; Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.; Concurrence by Judge Hurwitz SUMMARY*
Habeas Corpus / Death Penalty
The panel denied a petition for panel rehearing, denied on behalf of the court a petition for rehearing en banc, and replaced an April 1, 2015, opinion and concurring opinion with an amended opinion and concurring opinion, in a case in which the panel affirmed the district court’s denial of Clark Elmore’s habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction and death sentence for the rape and murder of his stepdaughter.