United States v. Dorothy C. Regan

Good Law
410 F.2d 744·23 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1460·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12616
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 29, 196922730_1California842 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hufstedler, J.

The Government appeals from a judgment in favor of the taxpayer in her suit for a refund of federal income taxes paid for the calendar years 1960-1962. The Government contends that the District Court erred in holding that the taxpayer, a member of a joint venture earning income from timber cutting contracts, could deduct from ordinary income her share of the venture’s costs of building access roads to the timber and that those costs were not capital expenses.

The facts are uncontroverted. The taxpayer and others formed a joint venture called Idapine Tenants in April 1960. Idapine Tenants bought the assets of a partnership engaged in the lumbering business. The assets included logging equipment, plants, and all of the capital stock of Idapine Mills, Inc., an Oregon corporation. The operating equipment was then leased to the corporation. Idapine Tenants had a contract with the Forest Service to cut merchantable timber on certain Government land for which rights Idapine Tenants agreed to pay a royalty based on a specified stumpage rate per thousand board feet cut and removed, and further agreed to build access roads to the timber stand. Idapine Tenants built the access roads.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.