John C. Van Houten v. Ray Arthur Ralls and Gerald L. Byington

Good Law
411 F.2d 940
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 20, 196922356_1California1,168 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamley, J.

John C. Van Houten commenced a suit against the United States and two employees of the federal Government in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. He sought to recover damages for injuries sustained when an automobile in which he was riding as a passenger collided with another vehicle due to the alleged negligence of both drivers. Both drivers, Ray Arthur Ralls and Gerald L. Bying-ton, and Van Houten himself, were employees of the United States acting within the scope of their employment at the time of the accident. Insofar as the United States was concerned, subject-matter jurisdiction was asserted under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b) (1964), and the Federal Drivers Act, 28 U.S.C. §-2679(b)-(e) (1964).

The Government moved for summary judgment dismissing the action as to the United States on the ground that, as a Government employee injured during the course of his employment, Van Houten’s sole remedy against the United States was his right to benefits under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA), 5 U.S.C. (Supp. II) (1967) §§ 8101 et seq. A motion was also made to dismiss the action as to the personal defendants on the ground…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.