Tri Valley Growers, Formerly Known as Tri-Valley Packing Association, (A Corporation) v. The Federal Trade Commission

Good Law
411 F.2d 985·1969 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,796·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12434
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 196921337_1California580 words

Opinion

Opinion

In Tri-Valley Packing Association v. Federal Trade Commission, 9 Cir., 329 F.2d 694 , which involved review of a cease and desist order entered by the Commission against Tri-Valley Packing Association, we reversed and remanded for further proceedings. Further agency proceedings, including an evidentiary hearing, then took place before a trial examiner. An Initial Decision was thereafter entered, sustaining the Commission’s charges that Tri-Valley had vi olated section 2(a) and (d) of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730 , as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 49 Stat. 1526 (Act), 15 U.S.C. § 13 (a) and (d) (1964). The Initial Decision included an order to cease and desist. On appeal to the Commission, that body entered a final order, together with an opinion, adopting with certain modifications, the Initial Decision on remand. This review was then instituted by Tri Valley Growers, formerly known as Tri-Valley Packing Association.

Tri Valley Growers presented the following six arguments in its opening brief on this second review:

1. The Commission received further evidence on the two price discrimination issues remanded. The Commission was without power to receive or consider such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.