Wayne Fong v. United States

Good Law
411 F.2d 1181·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12432
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 196923760California468 words

Opinion

Opinion

Beeks, J.

Wayne Fong appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate his judgment and sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 .

On the day he was to go to trial in May of 1958 appellant pleaded guilty to one count of a twelve-count indictment, which count charged the unlawful sale of narcotics. Before accepting the plea the trial judge carefully ascertained that Fong knew both the nature of the charge to which he wished to plead, and that as a second offender he could be sentenced to imprisonment for a minimum term of ten years and a maximum term of forty years. The trial judge inadvertently failed to inform appellant that he could also be fined up to $20,000.00, and that he would be ineligible for parole. Thereafter, appellant was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment and fined $1,000.00. Appellant now asserts that the judgment and sentence should be vacated because he was not informed that he would be ineligible for parole and that he could be fined, and because he was not accorded the right of allocution prior to the imposition of sentence.

Under the law as it existed at the time the plea was entered appellant was entitled to know the consequences of his plea.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.