Schwartz v. Franklin

Good Law
412 F.2d 736·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12023
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 196923265_1California1,442 words

Opinion

Opinion

412 F.2d 736 Louis R. SCHWARTZ, Appellant, v. Major General John FRANKLIN, Commanding General, VIth U.S. Army, Presidio, San Francisco, California, and Lt. William Bowman, Commanding Officer of the Stockade, Presidio, San Francisco, California, Appellees. No. 23265. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 10, 1969. 1 Richard McAdams (argued), Hugh B. Miller, of Jarvis, Miller & Stender, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. 2 Jerry K. Crimmet, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. 3 Before BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and * SOLOMON, district judge. SOLOMON, District Judge: 4 Louis R. Schwartz appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus from the United States Army. The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 2241. Hammond v. Lenfest, 398 F.2d 705 (2d Cir.1968). Our jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. 2253. 5 Schwartz enlisted in the Army Reserves in September, 1965. He signed a contract which said: 6 'If in any year I fail to perform satisfactorily any of the requirements set forth above, I can be ordered to perform active duty for training for a maximum of 45 days or be reported to Selective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.