United States v. California Portland Cement Company, a Corporation, Successor-In-Interest to Arizona Portland Cement Company, a Corporation, California Portland Cement Company, a Corporation, Successor-In-Interest to Arizona Portland Cement Company, a Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-Appellant. United States of America v. California Portland Cement Company, California Portland Cement Company, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee

Good Law
413 F.2d 161
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 196922398_1California8,239 words

Opinion

Opinion

413 F.2d 161 69-2 USTC P 9447 , 69-2 USTC P 9509 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, a corporation, Successor-in-Interest to Arizona Portland Cement Company, a corporation, Appellee. CALIFORNIA PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, a corporation, Successor-in-Interest to Arizona Portland Cement Company, a corporation, Cross-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America, Cross-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, Appellee. CALIFORNIA PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY, Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Cross-Appellee. Nos. 22397, 22397-A, 22398, 22398-A. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 4, 1969, Rehearing Denied July 1, 1969. Grant W. Wiprud (argued), Mitchell Rogovin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Robert Livingston, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Wm. Matthew Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Loyal E. Keir, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Stuart T. Peeler (argued), Joseph D. Peeler, Peter C. Bradford of Musick, Peeler & Garrett, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee. Before BARNES, DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Circuit Judge: 1 This is an appeal from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.