Danny Roy Shoemaker v. United States

Good Law
413 F.2d 274
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 13, 196922912California737 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamley, J.

Danny Roy Shoemaker, classified in the selective service system as I-O, failed to report to assigned civilian work as ordered by his local draft board. He was indicted for knowingly failing to perform a duty in violation of Section 12(a) of the Universal Military Training and Service Act (Act), 62 Stat. 622 (1948), 50 U.S.C. App. § 462(a) (1964). Following a non-jury trial he was convicted and given a three year sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 4208 (a) (2) (1964). This appeal followed.

Shoemaker argues that he should have been acquitted because he presented a prima facie case for a IY-D ministerial classification and he asserts that no evidence whatsoever appears to rebut the claim. Under a IV-D classification a registrant, as in the case of a I-O classification, is exempt from induction. But one classified IV-D, unlike a I-O registrant, is not subject to a board order requiring him to engage in selected civilian employment for any period of time. See section 6(g) of the Act, 62 Stat. 611 , 50 U.S.C. App. § 456(g) (1964); Daniels v. United States, 9 Cir., 372 F.2d 407, 409, note 2 .

Shoemaker did not defend in the trial court on the ground that he was entitled to a IV-D…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.