Amos A. Hopkins (Dukes) v. United States

Good Law
414 F.2d 464·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12344
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 196921456_1California5,290 words

Opinion

Opinion

Browning, J.

Each plaintiff-appellant filed an application with the Department of Interior for an Indian allotment of 160 acres of grazing lands in the public domain under section 4 of the General Allotment Act of 1887, as amended, 25 U.S.C. § 334 .

Seven applications were rejected by the District Land Office on the ground that the lands had been ordered sold pursuant to 43 U.S.C. § 1171 , and notice of this order had been published prior to the filing of the applications. See 43 C.F.R. § 2243.1-6 . The applicants were informed of their right to appeal the District Land Office’s decision to the Director of the Bureau of Land Management. They did not appeal.

The remaining twenty-six applications were rejected by the Secretary of Interior on the ground that the land applied for was not proper for allotment under the General Allotment Act because it did not constitute an economic grazing unit upon which the applicant could make a home and earn a livelihood raising livestock.

The applicants filed the present suit in the district court to require allotment of the lands. The court granted summary judgment dismissing the action. The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review rejection of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.