Rose-Marie Ofelina Del Rosario Pizarro v. District Director of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
18 A.L.R. Fed. 281·415 F.2d 481·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11042
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 196922915California851 words

Opinion

Opinion

McNICHOLS, J.

Appellant, considering herself aggrieved by an administrative decision of the appellee, obtained, in the district court, a judicial review of that decision. Jurisdiction was laid below under the Declaratory Judgment Act ( 28 U.S.C. § 2201 ) and Chapter 7 of the Administrative Procedure Act ( 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.)

Miss Pizarro, an alien, being a native and citizen of the Philippines, lawfully entered the United States as a non-immigrant visitor in October, 1965. She received an extension of stay in that category until April 23, 1967.

On April 11, 1967, appellant filed a petition for a preference status under Section 203(a) (3) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, as amended (8 U.S. C. § 1153(a) (3)) (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), as a professional trained in psychology. The referenced statute provides in applicable part as follows:

The Act defines the term “profession” to “include, but not be limited to architects, engineers, lawyers, physicians, surgeons and teachers in elementary or secondary schools, colleges, or academies, or seminaries.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a) (32).

From the record before us, it appears that the appellant holds a Bachelor of Science Degree…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.