Lane-Coos-Curry-Douglas Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Jens Horstrup

Good Law
415 F.2d 656·72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2149·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11073
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 196922169_1California4,423 words

Opinion

Opinion

415 F.2d 656 72 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2149 LANE-COOS-CURRY-DOUGLAS COUNTIES BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Jens HORSTRUP, Respondent. Nos. 22169, 22169-A. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Aug. 18, 1969. Paul T. Bailey, Portland, Or. (argued), Laurence J. Cohen, Washington, D.C., and Stephen M. Malm, of Bailey, Swink & Haas, Portland, Or., for petitioner. Glen M. Bendixsen (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Thomas P. Graham, Jr., Regional Director, Seattle, Wash., Robert J. Wiener, Officer-in-Charge, Portland, Or., for respondent. Riddlesbarger, Pederson, Brownhill & Young, Eugene, Or., for respondent Horstrup. Louis Sherman, Laurence J. Cohen, of Sherman & Dunn, Washington, D.C., for Building & Construction Trades Dept., AFL-CIO, amicus curiae. Before BROWNING, DUNIWAY, and CARTER, Circuit Judges. BROWNING, Circuit Judge: 1 The Trades Council and Jens Horstrup, its secretary-treasurer, ask us to set aside an order of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.