Wilber H. Friend, an Individual, and Friend Company, a Corporation v. H. A. Friend and Company, Inc.

Good Law
416 F.2d 526
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 3, 196922489_1California3,828 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnes, J.

The first of the two cases brought by appellee and combined here on appeal, seeking redress for alleged unfair competition and trade-mark infringement, was initiated in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on June 17, 1964. Jurisdiction was based upon the Federal TradeMark Act of 1946, the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1121 and upon 28 U.S.C. § 1338 . Diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 , was also alleged. On March 16, 1966, while that case was still pending, plaintiff appellee filed the second suit here appealed, charging appellant with misrepresentation and false advertising. Lanham Act and diversity jurisdiction were invoked. Jurisdiction in this court for the combined appeal and cross-appeal is based upon 15 U.S.C. § 1121 .

Appellee H. A. Friend & Co., Inc., an Illinois corporation (hereinafter H. A. Friend) traces its origin as a retail paper operation specializing in printed and engraved legal stationery to 1908. H. A. Friend is a family corporation currently operated by the three youngest sons of its namesake and founder, now deceased. Until 1948, the oldest of the Friend sons, Wilber, the co-appellant here, was an active partner, having…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.