United States v. Randall Theodore Milliken

Good Law
416 F.2d 676·1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10787
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 196924153California1,510 words

Opinion

Opinion

Williams, J.

Randall Theodore Milliken was indicted by the United States Grand Jury for the Northern District of California on a charge of refusing to submit to induction into the armed forces of the United States in violation of 50 App. U.S.C. § 462(a). He requested and received permission to represent himself at the trial but the court appointed an attorney to stand by for any aid and assistance he could furnish defendant. A jury con victed defendant and he was sentenced to the custody of the Attorney General of the United States for a period of two years. His appeal raises these issues:

1. Did the local board deny defendant due process in not reclassifying him after he requested reconsideration in the light of United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 , 85 S.Ct. 850 , 13 L.Ed.2d 733 (1965) ?

2. Do the Selective Service laws, as amended, discriminate against nonreligious objectors in violation of the first amendment?

Milliken registered with Local Board 31, Martinez, California, on November 27, 1964, a short period after his 18th birthday. He was given two student deferments and thereafter on July 4, 1966, defendant sent a letter to his local board in which he volunteered for the draft but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.